There is a borderland where the rigid deductions of the historian meet the wild, uncharted vistas of human imagination. It is upon this perilous frontier that we lay before you »Holmes and the Frisian Codex«.
First two chapters have been posted here:
1. Holmes and the Frisian Codex
2. Dissection of the Roster
It is my intent to pursue this narrative trail to its furthest extremity. When the final page is turned, we shall spare no pains to refine the whole into a definitive, polished version.
“Holmes and the Frisian Codex”
Re: “Holmes and the Frisian Codex”
For the last months I felt this forum was slowly becoming less active, and of course I knew it was mostly Ott, the main driver behind the forum, who got suddenly a bit silent.
There could be many reasons, personal or other, but I felt it was obvious from the little he wrote here recently, Ott was very busy with the chronology, to prove the Oera Linda to be real (?). But now I feel like it is more like a paradigm shift? If the Jesuits were involved, did they use a real document for their advantage, or was it a total forgery to prove their chronology?
I feel we on this forum all want the OLB to be authentic, but truth matters most to me. I can't wait what Sherlock will reveal in the next part!
There could be many reasons, personal or other, but I felt it was obvious from the little he wrote here recently, Ott was very busy with the chronology, to prove the Oera Linda to be real (?). But now I feel like it is more like a paradigm shift? If the Jesuits were involved, did they use a real document for their advantage, or was it a total forgery to prove their chronology?
I feel we on this forum all want the OLB to be authentic, but truth matters most to me. I can't wait what Sherlock will reveal in the next part!